Is It Really Necessary To Have Sequels?

Is It Really Necessary To Have Sequels

Everyone loves a good tale In these days of film series with many episodes increasing numbers of people are signing up to various platforms that allow users to stream movies that have more than five seasons.

Can we really say that audiences want more movies because of the success and popularity of series or shows that are seasonal? It’s a mix of both.

If a film is successful the film should be concluded so that the actors and crew can leave when the ovation is loudest. It’s possible that the sequel may not meet the expectations and expectations of the original film, which can be a concern for all.

It has been this way for quite a while. Many viewers rush to the cinema in excitement to see “part 2” of a film that is highly successful, but they are disappointed.

It’s not that the sequels aren’t bad, but the hype surrounding them has resulted in disappointments too many times. There is a lot of expectation because of the original film and, therefore, in order for a sequel to be successful, it has to be flawless or else it’ll be subject to harsh criticism.

With this information and decades of experiencing failures with sequels, the movie industry isn’t slowing down. They are making sequels to many films regardless of how profitable they have been — and the viewers are really thinking about the reason.

For the cast and crew they earn their money either way however, the film’s production company and the other “shareholders” are not able to make any money from these highly critiqued sequels.

If movie makers had done more study and listened to the voice of movie lovers the loss of these films would never be a reality. Even though success-driven sequels have been made, however, many others were not successful and the distinction between the two results is based on more than the skills of actors, cameramen, producers, and all those who work to make the film.

A movie sequel’s success is determined by a few key points. They are the need of the movie in question as well as what the general public’s opinion is about it.

The successful sequels have been able to have these points on their side, while the unsuccessful ones have been smacked with points to them. These points are, despite being very fundamental, essential to the success and longevity of the sequel to a film.

Do you need a sequel?

It is reasonable to assume that this issue is considered prior to when sequels are produced however, judging by the numerous failures this question doesn’t seem to be a deciding element for the majority of movie makers.

It’s a good idea. Actually, it is the first thing to address prior to sequels being made. The sequel might be successful even if it’s not required It has happened many times and this is likely the reason producers are taking risks all on the initial film’s focus even when the sequel isn’t needed.

If a sequel is required it is certain that it will be a success. Because despite the success of the first film there are already fans eagerly anticipating the sequel.

This is why you have a variety of films that became famous after sequels were made. The sequel’s goal is to be more successful and to enhance the plot of the first film.

A sequel is only created when it is necessary. It is also necessary when:

  • The story of the origin is not complete.
  • It was planned from the beginning of the film’s production
  • It was planned to be a franchise right from the beginning
  • Fans continue to beg for it.

Is a sequel necessary?

As you’ve probably guessed there are sequels that are unnecessary but end up being successful. You shouldn’t assume that it will always go this way, because the success of a film can depend on luck and the movie star.

Then, it becomes obvious that a sequel will be unlikely to succeed. It’s not needed. No one is asking for it. And since nobody wants it, there will be extremely low attendance at cinemas.

So, a sequel should not be made when it is unnecessary and also not needed in the following situations:

  • The first film was finished and uncut.
  • The fans aren’t asking for it.
  • There was no strategy to turn it into a franchise from the beginning
  • If the public speaks against it,

It’s not essential to consider the impact of the first film when making the sequel. If the film was not a huge success, however, that doesn’t mean that a sequel should be put on hold. A well-written sequel will complement an enthralling origin story which is typically how successful franchises are created.

The opinion of viewers ought to count

This is where a lot of producers get wrong; they ignore the opinion of their fans and consider them to be people who purchase tickets to watch their films. In the business world, consumers are a major determinant of what products and services should be made available and sold. The same is true for films.

Production firms, the wrong choice they take is to create sequels based on their predicted economic benefits on their own, without thinking about what fans actually would like to see.

They shouldn’t dictate the way a business should be doing. While people are paid to make these decisions but the primary people are paying more to get their opinions.

It should be made accessible to people looking for a sequel. If they feel that a movie doesn’t need an additional sequel, their opinions are to be considered and not ignored.

Online voting, opinion polls as well as a myriad of alternatives are available to let moviemakers know where the fans stand.